OUR
PROPERTY PAPERS PEOPLE POWER
FEDERAL LIMITS
FEDERAL LIMITS
Due process isn't optional

YOUR REPRESENTATIVES SHOULD HEAR FROM You

Mayors State Legislature Congress Vice/President
The 9 Standards
What we measure

The 9 Cooperation Standards

Nine things a legislator can pass and a citizen can say on the phone. Click any standard to see what "exists" vs. "enforceable" actually means.

  1. Warrants required
    A judge-signed warrant is required before state or local officers assist with federal civil enforcement. An administrative detainer is not enough.
    Exists
    State law says warrants are required, but there's no penalty for agencies that ignore it and honor detainers anyway.
    Enforceable
    Agencies that violate the warrant requirement lose state funding, face AG investigation, or are subject to lawsuits. The requirement has survived a court challenge.
    Why it matters
    Without this, a federal agent can fax a form to your county jail and have someone held for 48 extra hours with no judicial review. That's not cooperation -- that's commandeering.
  2. Schools, hospitals, and courthouses are off-limits
    Civil enforcement operations do not take place at schools, hospitals, courthouses, or places of worship. People have to be able to access basic services without fear.
    Exists
    State law designates these as sensitive locations. But there's no penalty if an operation happens there anyway.
    Enforceable
    Violations trigger civil penalties, private lawsuits, or automatic state investigation. Institutions have a legal duty to deny entry and are shielded from retaliation.
    Why it matters
    If people stop going to the hospital, stop sending kids to school, or stop showing up to court because they're afraid, the entire civic infrastructure breaks down.
  3. Cooperation is documented and authorized
    When the federal government requests state cooperation, the request is logged, authorized through the chain of command, and publicly reported.
    Exists
    State law requires documentation of federal requests. But there's no consequence for failing to document, and reports aren't public.
    Enforceable
    Documentation is mandatory with AG oversight. Annual public reporting required by statute. Failure to document triggers investigation.
    Why it matters
    If nobody writes it down, nobody knows it happened. Transparency is the foundation of accountability.
  4. The state doesn't pay for it
    State and local resources -- officers, facilities, equipment, staff time -- are not provided free of charge to federal enforcement operations.
    Exists
    State law prohibits using state resources for federal enforcement. But there's no cost tracking, no reimbursement mechanism, and no public reporting.
    Enforceable
    Mandatory cost tracking and public reporting. Reimbursement requirements before resources are provided. Pre-authorization through the state budget process.
    Why it matters
    The federal enforcement apparatus depends on state subsidies to operate at scale. If the federal government has to pay for its own operations, the scope shrinks to what it can actually afford.
  5. Elections stay clean
    Voter rolls, election infrastructure, and voter registration data are walled off from federal enforcement operations. No access, no cross-referencing, no intimidation at polling places.
    Exists
    State law restricts access to voter data for enforcement purposes. But the restriction is administrative policy rather than statute.
    Enforceable
    Hard statutory denial of voter data for enforcement purposes. Judicially tested. Violations carry criminal penalties.
    Why it matters
    If people believe that registering to vote puts them on an enforcement list, they stop registering. The ballot box is off-limits. Period.
  6. If they break the rules, you can do something about it
    When these standards are violated, there is a real enforcement mechanism. Either citizens can sue, or the state AG enforces with statutory penalties, or both.
    Exists
    There's a complaint process or the AG has discretionary enforcement authority. But no private right of action, penalties are weak, and enforcement depends on political will.
    Enforceable
    Private right of action -- any affected person can file suit. Statutory penalties with specific dollar amounts. AG enforcement that is mandatory, not discretionary.
    Why it matters
    Every other standard on this list is only as strong as the mechanism that enforces it. A warrant requirement with no penalty is a suggestion. This is the teeth behind every other standard.
  7. Federal enforcement contracts are regulated
    State law governs whether and how local governments enter into 287(g) agreements, detention contracts, or other arrangements that provide resources to federal enforcement.
    Exists
    State law restricts or requires disclosure of federal enforcement contracts. But no prohibition, no penalties, no approval process.
    Enforceable
    State law prohibits or strictly regulates federal enforcement contracts. Requires state-level authorization. Violations carry penalties.
    Why it matters
    If a county can sign a deal to house federal detainees or deputize its officers as federal agents without state oversight, every other protection on this list has a backdoor.
  8. Private detention operates under state rules
    State law governs whether private companies can operate detention facilities or enforcement infrastructure within the state.
    Exists
    State law requires licensing, disclosure, or inspection of private detention facilities. But no prohibition, weak penalties.
    Enforceable
    State law prohibits or strictly regulates private detention. Licensing conditions require compliance with state standards. Violations trigger facility closure or loss of business licenses.
    Why it matters
    A state can score perfectly on Standards 1-7 and still have thousands of private detention beds operating completely outside the cooperation framework. This closes that gap.
  9. States coordinate defense against pressure
    The state participates in formal multi-state coordination to defend its cooperation standards -- binding compacts, shared legal defense, mutual fiscal aid.
    Exists
    State participates in AG coalitions or files amicus briefs. No formal compact, no binding commitments, no shared resources.
    Enforceable
    State is party to a formal interstate compact with shared legal defense fund, mutual fiscal aid provisions, and pre-committed response triggers.
    Why it matters
    One state is a target. Fifteen states are a coalition. When the federal government threatens to pull highway funds from one state, that state faces a billion-dollar decision alone. Coordination changes the math.
How we score

Missing. Exists. Enforceable.

Three levels. No sub-scores. No filler.

0
Missing
No law on the books. No protection. The state hasn't acted.
1
Exists
A law exists but has no penalties, no enforcement mechanism, or hasn't been tested.
2
Enforceable
Law with teeth. Penalties, oversight, tested in court. Will hold under pressure.

9 standards scored 0 – 2 each. Max 18.

A: 15–18
B: 12–14
C: 8–11
D: 4–7
F: 0–3

How Protected Is Your State?

Section 287(g)
What You Don't Know
The Official Story
"Cooperation Between Local and Federal Law Enforcement"

That's what they call it.

287(g) agreements are described as "partnerships" that allow local law enforcement to "assist" with immigration enforcement.

The language is administrative. Bureaucratic. Boring by design.

It isn't.

The Fine Print
How the Agreements Work
Your officers become federal agents.
Not "assistants." Not "partners." They operate under federal command.
Your county absorbs the risk.
ICE reimburses some costs. But overtime gaps, legal liability, administrative burden, and jail upkeep? That's on taxpayers.
Your sheriff signs alone.
No county commission. No public hearing. No voter consent.
The Incentive
Some Sheriffs Profit.

"Guaranteed minimum" contracts pay for every bed — full or empty.

When detention becomes revenue,
who gets detained?

The Numbers
This Isn't Policy. It's Infrastructure.

135 counties had 287(g) agreements in January 2025.

By January 2026:

1,372
Counties under federal deputization
135
1,372

916% growth in twelve months.

Follow the Money
Ten Years of ICE Budgets
+190% in one year
'16 '18 '20 '22 '24 '25
$6B
2016
$29B
2025

Border crossings are down 56% from peak.

Meanwhile
The Arsenal is Already Here

$7.4 billion

in military equipment transferred to local police.

Free. Since 1997.

The 1033 Program.

287(g) added authority.

History
Why This Matters:
Posse Comitatus

In 1878, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act.

The law prohibits the use of the U.S. military for domestic law enforcement.

Why? Because a military force deployed against the domestic population,
answerable only to the Executive, is the definition of tyranny.

For 148 years, this law has been a firewall.

The Loophole
Hidden Identity. Federal Authority.
The Military Can't
Deploy domestically
Raid homes & workplaces
Arrest civilians
Answer only to the Executive
287(g) Officers Can
Deploy domestically
Raid homes & workplaces
Arrest civilians
Answer only to the Executive

1372 counties and growing.

Tens of thousands of officers.

Zero congressional appropriation.

Little judicial review.

Answerable to one person.

This system will outlast:
This president
This Congress
This Supreme Court
Your ability to predict who comes next
Your County
This Isn't About Immigration
Who signed for your county?
Did you vote on it? Were you consulted?
What happens when this targets someone else?
The mechanisms don't specify nationality. They specify federal priorities.
What is the limiting principle?
If local police can be federalized without your consent, what else can they do?
"He has kept among us, in Times of Peace, Standing Armies without the consent of our Legislatures." — Declaration of Independence, 1776
What Now?
One person screaming is noise. One thousand, coordinated, is pressure. One million, sustained, is power.
This is how we organize.
Your Move
2026 We organize.
2028 We flip seats.
2030 We pass protections.
2035 Federal Limits restored.
The next decade starts with you.
The Target

State law.

That's where the power is. That's where we push.

Your First Action

Step one: Tell them you're watching.

Your state legislators. Your members of Congress.

One message. That's all it takes to start.

The Numbers Game
One message: noted.
Ten messages: a concern.
A hundred messages: a problem they have to address.
We help you be part of the hundred.
Your Community

Politics is local.

Your state. Your district. Your community.

Find the people fighting alongside you.

Your Power

Politicians care about one thing: staying in office.

We make Federal Limits a voting issue.

Support the champions. Primary the blockers.

The Wins

Every win builds the next.

One state passes protections others follow.
One rep flips others take notice.

Momentum is real. We're building it.

Click or tap to continue
Federal Enforcement Timeline
ICE daily arrests, Jan 2025 – Mar 2026
78K Detention Pop.
+95% vs Jan 2025
Click a bar for stories · Click a state to filter
DC

-

-
-

Make Your Voice Heard

"Your concerns. Your words. Their inbox."

2 min
To complete
YOUR
Email (no account)
ALL
Your representatives
Start Now

Stay Informed

History, current events, and deep dives

Featured

Why This Approach: Due Process Without Partisanship

Due-process protections work best when they're framed as core American values, not political talking points.

Coming Soon
Recent

Anti-Commandeering: The Legal Doctrine Protecting States

From Printz to Murphy — how the Supreme Court established limits on federal power.

Coming Soon
Deep Dive

The Data Broker Loophole: How Surveillance Bypasses State Laws

When states protect their databases, agencies buy the same data from private vendors.

Coming Soon
Grade D

1 Select Issues

2 Your Representatives

3 Preview & Send

Helps us track message volume, geographic engagement, issue priorities, and detect spam abuse. We never see replies.