What we do, how it works, and why it matters.
A civic tool that helps citizens contact their representatives about due-process safeguards. Enter your ZIP code, select your concerns, and we generate a ready-to-send message with specific policy asks for each level of government.
FederalLimits.org is a civic infrastructure project incorporating as a 501(c)(4). We build tools that work for anyone who believes in constitutional limits on federal authority — and we'll recognize candidates who share our values (and support primary challenges against those who don't).
No. We don't use that word — it's politically loaded and legally imprecise. What we advocate for is straightforward: states enforcing their own laws, requiring judicial warrants for cooperation, and protecting state resources from unfunded federal mandates. That's federalism, not sanctuary.
Due process. That's it. The same constitutional protections should apply to everyone, enforced through proper legal channels with judicial oversight. Left and right both have reasons to support limits on federal overreach — we build infrastructure that serves both.
Enter your ZIP code and we identify your representatives at every level: federal (senators, representative), state (governor, AG, legislators), and local (mayor, city council). We use Geocodio's API with official government data sources.
We'll ask for your street address to pinpoint your exact districts. Your address is used only for the lookup — we don't store it.
No. We generate the message and show you official contact channels. You copy the message and send it yourself through the rep's contact form, email, or phone. This keeps you in control and ensures your message comes from your own email.
Three reasons: (1) Representatives respond better to messages that come directly from constituents, (2) you should own your communication with your elected officials, and (3) we don't want to store your email or pretend to be you.
Specific policy asks tailored to each recipient. A state legislator gets different asks than a US Senator. A governor gets different asks than a city mayor. Each message includes concrete actions they can take at their level of authority.
We evaluate states on 12 consensus checks — specific due-process protections that legal experts agree are both constitutional and effective. States get graded A through F based on how many protections they have in place:
| Grade | Checks | Status |
|---|---|---|
| A | 10-12 | Strong protections |
| B | 7-9 | Good foundation, room to improve |
| C | 5-6 | Moderate protections |
| D | 3-4 | Weak protections |
| F | 0-2 | Minimal protections |
Primary sources: state statutes, executive orders, attorney general opinions, and official policy documents. We cite everything. If you find an error, let us know.
That's why the tool exists. Use it to contact your representatives and ask them to support specific safeguards. Change starts with constituent pressure.
Minimal. We don't require accounts. We don't store your address (used only for real-time lookup). We don't track which messages you send. Newsletter signup is optional and separate.
No. We don't sell data, share data with third parties, or use your information for anything other than powering the tool.
We can't share what we don't have. No accounts, no stored addresses, no message logs. Your browser talks to our server to get rep data — that's it.
Yes. Contacting your representatives is a constitutional right. Advocating for state policy changes is protected speech. Nothing we help you do is illegal.
Yes. The anti-commandeering doctrine is settled Supreme Court law. Printz v. United States (1997) established that the federal government cannot compel states to enforce federal law. Murphy v. NCAA (2018) reaffirmed this principle.
States can't directly regulate federal officers or block lawful federal operations. But they absolutely can control their own resources: who accesses state databases, what state employees help with, which facilities are available for federal use. That's the distinction.
Historically, states with strong due-process policies have not faced funding cuts. The federal government has limited tools to punish states for exercising their constitutional prerogatives. That said, we recommend states consult their own legal counsel on specific legislation.
Please do. Contact us for background, data access, or interviews.
Absolutely. We're happy to provide research, model language, or connect you with other states working on similar policies.