{ "version": 3.3, "framework": "9 Cooperation Standards (v3.3 — durability principle)", "spec_version": 3.3, "codebook_version": "3.3.1", "checks_version": 3.3, "scored_date": "2026-05-20", "schema_version": "2.0", "methodology_note": "Scored using methodology-v3.3-spec.md and methodology-v3.3-codebook.md (locked 2026-05-14). v3.3 binding principles: (1) functional protection > structural template (v3.2, retained); (2) DURABILITY — only durable binding state law scores (codified statutes, state constitutional provisions, state Supreme Court rulings); executive instruments (EOs, AG directives/opinions/guidance without statutory backing, agency/model policies) appear in per-state narrative but do not score (rescindability is not durability). Court-status modifier simplified (§3.1): a preliminary injunction (partial or full) is flagged in narrative and the score holds; only a permanent injunction or full strike-down drops the score to 0. 9 standards, each 0/1/2, max 18. Re-scored 2026-05-20 from the v3.2 baseline — 6 changes: NY STD-02 1→0, MA STD-03 1→0, MN STD-02 1→0 (executive-instrument credit dropped); NJ STD-08 2→1 (statutory oversight but no codified AG enforcement reaching local LE); WA STD-05 2→1 (only DMV domain statutorily firewalled); CA STD-09 1→2 (SB 805 preliminary injunction now flags rather than docks). Distribution unchanged (A=4, B=2, C=5, D=5, F=36); national avg 3.25→3.17. Confidence: high=statutory text or published source; medium=secondary sources triangulated. | 2026-06-10 audit corrections (primary-source verified): NY STD-05 2→1; MD STD-06 0→1 + STD-08 0→2 (Ch. 872 enacted post-scoring); ME STD-03 2→1; CA notes corrected (en banc 2022; SB 627 injunction flag; recording cite added). NY STD-08 re-cite pending Part LL text pull.", "grade_scale": { "A": [ 15, 18 ], "B": [ 12, 14 ], "C": [ 8, 11 ], "D": [ 4, 7 ], "F": [ 0, 3 ] }, "standards_definitions": [ { "id": "STD-01", "name": "Personnel & Resource Limits", "short": "State personnel and resources withdrawn from federal civil enforcement", "desc": "Whether the state has prohibited its officers, employees, money, equipment, facilities, and communications from being used in federal civil immigration enforcement operations.", "criteria": { "0": "No statutory protections", "1": "Partial: one dimension (personnel or resources) covered, or both with major carveouts", "2": "Both personnel and resources covered statewide, binding state and local agencies, with limited or no carveouts" } }, { "id": "STD-02", "name": "Cooperation Contract Prohibitions", "short": "287(g), IGSAs, and joint task force agreements banned", "desc": "Whether the state has banned 287(g) agreements — the federal program that deputizes local police to perform federal civil immigration enforcement. Under v3.3, the 287(g) ban alone is the 2/2 bar; supplementary contract bans (IGSAs, JTF MOUs, federally conditioned grants) are per-state narrative material.", "criteria": { "0": "No 287(g) prohibition, or state mandates 287(g) participation", "1": "Partial: 287(g) restricted but not fully banned (e.g., banned only in jail context, only certain departments, or non-statutory restriction via EO/AG directive/AG opinion)", "2": "287(g) agreements explicitly prohibited by state statute" } }, { "id": "STD-03", "name": "Sensitive Location Protections", "short": "Schools, hospitals, courthouses, churches off-limits to federal civil enforcement", "desc": "Whether the state has legislatively protected specific physical places from federal civil enforcement access: courthouses, schools, hospitals, childcare facilities, religious institutions, and workplaces.", "criteria": { "0": "No statutory location protections", "1": "Partial: 1-3 location types covered, or coverage with major carveouts", "2": "Four or more of six location types covered with judicial-warrant access standard" } }, { "id": "STD-04", "name": "Private Detention Industry Restrictions", "short": "Private contractors prohibited from operating immigration detention", "desc": "Whether the state has prohibited private contractors from operating immigration detention facilities within state borders.", "criteria": { "0": "No prohibition, or prohibition fully struck down or fully enjoined", "1": "Partial: prohibitions limited to new contracts, sunset provisions, scope carveouts, or statute partially enjoined", "2": "Comprehensive prohibition, no sunset clause, narrow or no carveouts, statute in force" } }, { "id": "STD-05", "name": "Information Firewalls", "short": "State data systems firewalled from federal civil enforcement requests", "desc": "Whether the state has firewalled its data systems from federal civil enforcement requests across five domains: voter rolls, DMV/driver records, school records, health records, and professional licensing data (PRWORA opt-out + organizational firewall).", "criteria": { "0": "No statutory data firewalls", "1": "1-2 data domains firewalled with hard-denial language", "2": "Three or more of five data domains firewalled with hard-denial statutory language" } }, { "id": "STD-06", "name": "Warrant Requirement", "short": "Judicial warrant required + rights notifications during enforcement encounters", "desc": "Whether the state requires a judicial warrant — signed by a federal Article III judge, not an administrative warrant signed by a federal agent — before honoring federal civil enforcement detention or transfer requests. Under v3.3, the judicial warrant requirement alone is the 2/2 bar; rights notifications are supplementary per-state narrative material.", "criteria": { "0": "State honors administrative detainers without judicial warrant requirement, or requirement exists only as voluntary policy", "1": "Warrant requirement with major carveouts (some cooperation categories exempted, or limited scope of state actors covered, or applies only to specific contexts)", "2": "Judicial warrant (federal Article III judge) required statewide for any detention, hold, or transfer for federal civil enforcement; no administrative-detainer exception" } }, { "id": "STD-07", "name": "Documentation Transparency", "short": "Public reporting of cooperation activity by all state and local agencies", "desc": "Whether the state has functioning public reporting infrastructure that makes state-federal cooperation activity verifiable. State statute (not executive order or AG guidance) must require annual public reporting by state and local LE; reports must be publicly accessible. PII-tracking statutes (STD-05 territory) and non-statutory instruments (EO/guidance/model policy) are excluded under v3.3 §4.7.", "criteria": { "0": "No qualifying public-reporting statute, OR cited instrument is PII-tracking only (STD-05 turf), OR cited instrument is non-statutory (EO/guidance/model policy)", "1": "Statutory reporting requirement covers state agencies only (not local LE); OR reports route to legislature/AG/oversight body without public posting; OR ad-hoc cadence without fixed schedule", "2": "State statute requires annual public reporting by state and local LE on interactions with federal civil enforcement; reports publicly accessible; a reasonably-diligent reader can assess cooperation activity" } }, { "id": "STD-08", "name": "Enforcement & Remedies", "short": "Private right of action + statutory AG enforcement authority", "desc": "Whether the state has created legal mechanisms that make cooperation laws enforceable — either a comprehensive private right of action allowing residents to sue, OR comprehensive statutory Attorney General authority with reach to local LE. Under v3.3, either mechanism comprehensively implemented satisfies 2/2.", "criteria": { "0": "Neither mechanism in statute; general civil rights remedies (Converse-1983) do not contribute per §4.8 exclusion", "1": "Mechanism present but limited (narrow standing, declaratory-only without injunctive/damages, covers only some cooperation-law violations, or AG authority that excludes local LE)", "2": "Either comprehensive PRA (damages or injunctive relief; no major carveouts) OR comprehensive statutory AG authority with reach to local LE" } }, { "id": "STD-09", "name": "Federal Agent Identification & Recording", "short": "Visible ID + mask prohibition + recording requirement for all law enforcement", "desc": "Whether the state requires visible identification (badge, name, agency) AND prohibits masks for law enforcement on duty AND requires recording of enforcement interactions — applied to all law enforcement in the state, with a civil enforcement mechanism.", "criteria": { "0": "No identification, mask, or recording statute reaching law enforcement in the state", "1": "One or two of the three substantive dimensions covered, OR all three but lacking civil enforcement mechanism. 'Strong 1' narrative note applied where 2 of 3 dimensions present with broad framing and civil enforcement mechanism", "2": "All three substantive dimensions (visible ID + mask prohibition + recording) + civil enforcement mechanism. Court-status modifier per §3 handles enjoined statutes" } } ], "summary": { "total_scored": 52, "grade_distribution": { "F": 36, "A": 4, "C": 3, "B": 3, "D": 6 }, "mandate_states": 21, "avg_score": 3.29, "median_score": 0, "total_sum": 171, "max_possible": 936, "scored_states_by_grade": { "A": [ "CA", "IL", "NJ", "OR" ], "B": [ "CT", "NY", "WA" ], "C": [ "CO", "MD", "NM" ], "D": [ "DC", "MA", "ME", "NV", "VA", "VT" ] }, "court_status_modifier_states": [ "CA", "NJ" ] }, "states": { "AK": { "name": "Alaska", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No statute. AK DOC entered ICE contract June 2025 (opposite direction).", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "AK DOC and Kodiak PD have active 287(g) agreements. No prohibition.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No protected locations.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "AK DOC paid $223.70/detainee/day to house ICE detainees.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Active breach: Lt. Gov. Dahlstrom signed DOJ voter-data MOU Dec 2025; ACLU/EPIC sued Apr 2026.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No warrant requirement.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No reporting law.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No PRA, no statutory AG authority.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No statute.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "AL": { "name": "Alabama", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No protective statute. HB 56 + SB 158 mandate cooperation.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "9+ active 287(g); HB 56 framework permits and encourages.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None of 6 location types protected. SB 63 mandates biometric collection (opposite).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "AL firms awarded DHS emergency detention contracts 2025.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Multiple opposite-direction statutes (Title 31 Ch.13).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No judicial-warrant requirement. SB 53/SB 63 create opposite-direction enforcement.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No protective transparency law.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No PRA, no statutory AG protective authority.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No identification or recording statute.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "AR": { "name": "Arkansas", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "A.C.A. § 14-1-103 / SB 411 (2019)", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Act 654 explicitly prohibits local sanctuary policies. Mandate-cooperation direction.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "40+ agencies signed cooperation agreements; State Police MOU adds 607 troopers.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Act 654 mandates sheriff/DOC WSO participation.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "0 domains. AG Griffin used cooperation-mandate authority Sept 2025 (opposite).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "AZ": { "name": "Arizona", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "SB 1070 § 2(B) (2010, surviving provision per Arizona v. United States)", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "SB 1070 §2(B)", "notes": "Mandates immigration status checks during stops. Opposite direction.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "6 of 15 counties + Mesa + AZ-DOC have 287(g). No prohibition.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Prop 314 shifts federal enforcement costs to AZ taxpayers.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "DOJ obtained voter data; Prop 314 mandates citizenship verification.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "CA": { "name": "California", "total_score": 16, "grade": "A", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": true, "court_status_modifier_notes": "STD-04: AB 32 permanently enjoined as applied to ICE/USMS detention contractors (GEO Group v. Newsom, 9th Cir. en banc Sept 26 2022; final judgment S.D. Cal. May 23 2023) → score 0 (no operative private-immigration-detention prohibition; AB 32 survives for non-federal detention only). STD-09: preliminary injunctions flagged per v3.3 §3.1, score holds — SB 805 §10 ID-display (9th Cir. No. 26-926, Apr 22 2026, pending appeal) + SB 627 mask prohibition as to federal officers (C.D. Cal., ~Feb 9 2026). Without the STD-04 modifier CA would be 18/18.", "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 54 / Gov. Code §7284.6 + AB 4 TRUST Act", "notes": "Comprehensive state+local prohibition on money/facilities/property/equipment/personnel for civil immigration enforcement. Reference standard.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 54 §7284.9 (287(g) ban) + AB 103 (IGSA detention contract ban)", "notes": "287(g) lynchpin met + IGSA prohibition. Reference standard.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 54 §7284.4 + AB 49 (schools, 2025) + AB 495 (daycare, 2025)", "notes": "Schools, hospitals, courthouses, libraries, daycare = 5 of 6 location types with judicial-warrant standard.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "AB 32 (2019) — PERMANENTLY ENJOINED as applied to ICE/USMS contractors (GEO Group v. Newsom, 9th Cir. en banc Sept 26 2022; final judgment May 23 2023)", "notes": "Court-status modifier: permanent injunction (stipulated final judgment) covers federal immigration detention contractors — the application this standard measures. AB 32 remains operative for non-federal private detention only. Monitor: GEO Group v. Newsom, 2:24-cv-02924 (E.D. Cal., filed Oct 22 2024), substance unconfirmed.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 2, "cite": "AB 60 (DMV) + AB 699/AB 49 (schools) + AB 1184 (health) + SB 1159 (licensing) + AG voter-data refusal", "notes": "All 5 of 5 domains firewalled with hard-denial language. Strongest in country.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 54 + AB 263 (rights notification) + AG model policy", "notes": "Judicial warrant required statewide; rights notifications mandated under SB 54 §7284.10.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 54 §7284.10 (annual AG Values Act report) + AB 103 detention review", "notes": "Per revised codebook §4.7 (2026-05-10): annual reporting with all-agency coverage, full scope, public posting satisfies 2-point bar. AG Bonta publishes annual SB 54 Values Act Report.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 54 §7284.10 + AB 263 (sector PRA only)", "notes": "Statutory AG authority comprehensive: Bonta v. El Cajon 2025; investigated 12+ local LE; sued HHS over Medicaid data. Reach to local LE demonstrated. Per v3.3: either PRA or AG comprehensive = 2/2.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 627 (No Secret Police Act, 2025, Penal Code §185.5 mask prohibition) + SB 805 (No Vigilantes Act, 2025, ID display) + Penal Code §148(g)/§69(b) (SB 411, 2015 — citizen recording)", "notes": "Base 2/2: visible ID (SB 805) + mask prohibition (SB 627) + recording dimension via PC §148(g)/§69(b) (statutory protection for civilian recording; drafted as carve-out from resisting/obstruction liability rather than affirmative right — satisfies codebook §4.9 'citizen-recording authorization') + civil enforcement mechanism. v3.3 court-status (§3.1) flags, scores hold: SB 805 §10 prelim. injunction (9th Cir. No. 26-926, Apr 22 2026, pending appeal); SB 627 mask ban prelim. injunction as to federal officers (C.D. Cal., ~Feb 9 2026; appellate track unconfirmed). Only permanent injunction/strike-down drops the score.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "CO": { "name": "Colorado", "total_score": 11, "grade": "C", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 19-1124 / CRS § 24-76.6-102 + SB 25-276 + SB 21-131", "notes": "State+local statutory stack; prohibits ICE-cooperation resource use comprehensively.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 1, "cite": "HB 23-1100 (IGA jail contracts ban)", "notes": "IGSA ban present; no explicit 287(g) statutory ban. CO has no 287(g) agreements, but lynchpin test requires explicit prohibition. Score 1 not 2.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 20-083 (courthouses) + SB 25-276 (schools, hospitals, childcare)", "notes": "4 of 6 location types covered with judicial-warrant standard.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No private-detention prohibition; Aurora ICE facility (private GEO Group) operating.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 24-182 + SB 21-131 + SB 25-276 + HB 19-1124", "notes": "4 of 5 domains firewalled (voter, DMV, schools, health). Hard-denial language.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 19-1124 (judicial warrant requirement) + SB 25-276", "notes": "Judicial warrant required statewide under HB 19-1124 + SB 25-276; covers detention, hold, transfer for federal civil enforcement. No administrative-detainer exception. Per v3.3: warrant requirement alone = 2/2 (rights notification supplementary).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "SB 21-131 (quarterly Governor's Office PII reporting from all state agencies)", "notes": "SB 21-131 and SB 25-276 are PII data-privacy statutes (STD-05 territory), not cooperation-activity reporting. Per v3.3 §4.7 PII-tracking exclusion: do not contribute to STD-07. CO has no qualifying cooperation-reporting statute.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 25-276 (civil penalties up to $50,000, AG enforcement)", "notes": "Statutory AG enforcement with $50K civil penalty (SB 25-276) directed to Immigration Legal Defense Fund. Reaches state agencies, political subdivisions, county sheriffs, municipal police. Per v3.3: AG authority comprehensive = 2/2.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No enacted federal-agent ID/mask/recording statute.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "CT": { "name": "Connecticut", "total_score": 13, "grade": "B", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 2, "cite": "CGS § 54-192h (PA 13-155) + HB 7212 (2025)", "notes": "Statutory state+local restriction; HB 7212 (2025) codifies broader resource prohibitions.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 1, "cite": "HB 7212 (2025) Prohibited State Contracts", "notes": "Bars state contracts assisting civil enforcement; CT has no formal 287(g) program but lacks explicit statutory 287(g) ban. Lynchpin test → score 1.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 397 (May 4, 2026) + PA 25-3 (HB 8004 courthouses)", "notes": "Schools, hospitals, social service agencies, houses of worship, courthouses = 5 of 6 covered.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No private-detention prohibition.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 7212 (2025) + AG Tong School Guidance + Drive-Only License confidentiality (CGS §14-12)", "notes": "4 of 5 domains firewalled (voter, DMV, schools, health). Hard-denial under HB 7212.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 2, "cite": "CGS § 54-192h + HB 7212 (2025)", "notes": "Judicial warrant requirement + rights notifications under TRUST Act framework.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 7212 (2025) + AG TRUST Act guidance memo", "notes": "HB 7212 signing status unverified as of 2026-05-11 (passed House May 2025; Senate disposition unconfirmed). AG TRUST Act guidance memo is non-binding guidance, not statute. Per v3.3 §4.7 required-instrument-class rule: neither instrument satisfies.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 7212 (PRA: compensatory damages + attorney's fees, eff. Oct 1, 2025) + statutory AG authority", "notes": "Both mechanisms present: PRA + statutory AG enforcement authority. Reference standard.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 397 (signed May 4, 2026) — mask ban + visible badges + name tags + civil suit rights", "notes": "Visible ID + mask prohibition + recording dimension satisfied via state body camera mandates per codebook §4.9 edge case. Civil enforcement mechanism present.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "DC": { "name": "District of Columbia", "total_score": 6, "grade": "D", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 2, "cite": "D.C. Code § 24-211.07(a)(1)-(4) (Sanctuary Values Act, 2021)", "notes": "Article III judge or magistrate warrant required; facility/equipment/housing prohibition.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 1, "cite": "D.C. Code § 24-211.07(a)(3)", "notes": "Facility-use ban; no formal 287(g) with MPD; no explicit statutory 287(g) ban.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 1, "cite": "D.C. Code § 24-211.07", "notes": "DC detention facility access protected; no community sensitive-location coverage (schools/hospitals/churches).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No private-detention prohibition.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 1, "cite": "D.C. Code §50-1401.05 + DC voter MOU refusal", "notes": "2 of 5 domains (DMV + voter posture). Mayor Aug 2025 EO opened compliance gap.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "D.C. Code § 24-211.07(f) — DISCLAIMS PRA", "notes": "Statute explicitly disclaims private right of action; warrant requirement counted at STD-01.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 1, "cite": "D.C. Code § 24-211.07(d) + DC Law 26-55 (annual public reporting)", "notes": "Annual reporting; compliance gap from Mayor's Aug 2025 EO.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "D.C. Code § 24-211.07(f) explicitly disclaims PRA", "notes": "No PRA, no statutory AG authority specifically over cooperation laws.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "DE": { "name": "Delaware", "total_score": 3, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 1, "cite": "HB 182 (2025)", "notes": "Implicit detainer refusal via 287(g) and data-sharing ban. Partial — covers contract prohibition but limited day-to-day resource scope.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 182 (2025) — 287(g) statutory ban + state/local prohibition (signed Meyer July 14, 2025; existing terminations by July 1, 2025)", "notes": "287(g) lynchpin met statutorily.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No sensitive location protections.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No private detention prohibition.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "DE refused DOJ voter MOU but no statutory hard-denial in any domain.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "HB 152 (2025) impersonation criminal statute is indirect; no judicial warrant requirement.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No public reporting requirement.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "HB 152 indirect. No PRA; no statutory AG authority specifically for cooperation laws.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "FL": { "name": "Florida", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "SB 168 (2019) / F.S. §908.101-.104", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "SB 168 / F.S. §908.101-.104", "notes": "Mandate-cooperation; preempts local non-cooperation.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "SB 2-C (Ch. 2025-1)", "notes": "MANDATES 287(g); all 67 county jails enrolled.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "SB 1718 mandates hospital reporting (opposite).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "SB 2-C reimburses leasing detention to feds.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "0 domains; multiple opposite-direction surveillance mandates.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "SB 708 died in committee.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "SB 2-C empowers AG against non-cooperators (opposite).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "GA": { "name": "Georgia", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 87 (2011)", "notes": "No protective statute.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 1105", "notes": "~29 active + 4 pending 287(g). GA DPS Task Force Model March 2025.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No prohibition.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "OCGA §50-36-1", "notes": "SAVE verification mandated (opposite).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "HB 1105 mandates cooperation.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "HB 1105 imposes forced-cooperation reporting (opposite).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "HB 295 (pending) would add civil-suit exposure (opposite).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "HI": { "name": "Hawaii", "total_score": 1, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "HB 1768/1886/2540 still pending.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "HB 1768 (287(g) prohibition) in active conference, not enacted.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "HB 1870 not yet enacted.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 1, "cite": "HRS §286-122 (limited-purpose DL confidentiality) + voter-MOU refusal", "notes": "2 of 5 domains (DMV + voter posture). Partial.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "HB 1886 pending.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "IA": { "name": "Iowa", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "Iowa Code Chapter 27A", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "Iowa Code Ch. 27A", "notes": "Mandates compliance; National Guard deployed Aug 2025.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No prohibition.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "SF 2218, SF 2340", "notes": "Citizenship oath added; opposite direction.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Ch. 27A mandates compliance.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Ch. 27A imposes certification loss + funding withholding (opposite).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "ID": { "name": "Idaho", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "HB 83 mandates cooperation when in custody.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "10 active 287(g) (8 signed 2025-2026).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "DHS-Idaho joint operation June 2025.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "IL": { "name": "Illinois", "total_score": 16, "grade": "A", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 2, "cite": "5 ILCS 805/15 (TRUST Act) + Way Forward Act (PA 102-0234) + Right to Privacy in Workplace Act", "notes": "State+local comprehensive resource prohibition. DOJ sanctuary suit dismissed July 25, 2025. Reference standard.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 2, "cite": "5 ILCS 805 (Way Forward Act bans 287(g)-style contracts) + 730 ILCS 141 (Private Detention Moratorium)", "notes": "287(g) lynchpin met + multiple contract categories. Reference standard.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 2, "cite": "PA 104-0288 (K-12 schools, signed Aug 15, 2025) + PA 104-0440 (courthouses/hospitals/higher-ed/childcare, signed Dec 9, 2025)", "notes": "5 of 6 location types with judicial warrant standard, $17K min damages, 3x multiplier, PRA, attorney fees.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 2, "cite": "730 ILCS 141 (Private Detention Moratorium, 2019) — permanent, no sunset", "notes": "Comprehensive private immigration detention ban; in force. Reference standard.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 2, "cite": "5 ILCS 805/15 + 625 ILCS 5/6-105.1 (TVDL) + AG Raoul school guidance + Way Forward Act", "notes": "All 5 domains firewalled. Strongest combined statutory+enforcement architecture after CA.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 2, "cite": "5 ILCS 805/15 (judicial warrant required) + AG enforcement framework", "notes": "Strong judicial warrant requirement; rights notifications via Way Forward Act framework.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 2, "cite": "5 ILCS 805/25 (annual LE reporting to AG on all DHS requests) + EO 2025-06 (Illinois Accountability Commission, Oct 2025)", "notes": "5 ILCS 805/25 (TRUST Act / Way Forward Act) requires annual reporting from all state, county, municipal LE to AG. AG publicly posts the WFA Public Report at illinoisattorneygeneral.gov with downloadable PDFs and Excel plus list of non-reporting agencies. Per v3.3: functional protection met — all four elements clear.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 2, "cite": "5 ILCS 805/30 (Way Forward Act AG enforcement)", "notes": "5 ILCS 805/30 AG enforcement comprehensive: Adams County investigation Aug 2025 demonstrated reach to local LE. Per v3.3: AG authority comprehensive = 2/2.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No enacted state-level statute on federal agent ID/mask/recording. Chicago EO is municipal, doesn't score.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "IN": { "name": "Indiana", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "IC 5-2-18.2 (2011) + SEA 76 (2026) + EO 25-29", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "IC 5-2-18.2", "notes": "Three-layer mandate-cooperation.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "SEA 76 (2026)", "notes": "Mandate-cooperation expansion.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "KS": { "name": "Kansas", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "S Sub HB 2372 (2026)", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "S Sub HB 2372 (2026)", "notes": "Authorizes detention on facially-sufficient ICE detainer alone.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 2437 (SAVE Kansas Act)", "notes": "Integrates federal SAVE database with voter rolls (opposite).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "KY": { "name": "Kentucky", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "HB 213 (Acts Ch. 73, 2026)", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 213 (Acts Ch. 73, 2026)", "notes": "Prohibits any policy restricting information sharing with federal immigration agencies.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "LA": { "name": "Louisiana", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "Act 314/SB 208 + Act 399/SB 15 + RS 14:100.14", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "RS 14:100.14", "notes": "Comprehensive mandate-cooperation.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "23+ agencies in 287(g).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "9 detention facilities.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "MA": { "name": "Massachusetts", "total_score": 5, "grade": "D", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 2, "cite": "Lunn v. Commonwealth (Mass. SJC 2017)", "notes": "State Supreme Court ruling counts as binding source per codebook §1.1.3; covers state AND local LE on warrantless ICE holds.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "No durable statutory 287(g) bar. EO 650 (Healey, 2026-01-29) is an executive order -> scores 0 under sec.1.3 (rescindable).", "notes": "Re-scored 1->0 (2026-05-21 durability audit): STD-02 rested solely on EO 650 (non-durable EO). No statutory 287(g) ban; Lunn v. Commonwealth (SJC) covers detainers (STD-06), not 287(g).", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "v3.3 durability (§4.3): no durable statutory sensitive-location protection. Coverage rests on EO 650 (Gov. Healey, Jan 29 2026), an executive order (rescindable); the PROTECT Act passed both chambers but is in conference, not enacted. EO-only → 0; EO retained in per-state narrative.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No private-detention prohibition.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 1, "cite": "Work and Family Mobility Act (MGL c. 90, §8B) + DOL Nlets blocks Nov 2025 + voter-MOU refusal", "notes": "2 domains (DMV + voter posture).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 2, "cite": "Lunn v. Commonwealth + AG Campbell municipal guidance", "notes": "SJC holding requires judicial warrant; rights notifications via AG guidance.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "EO 650 + AG Campbell guidance", "notes": "EO 650 is executive order, not statute. Per v3.3 §4.7 required-instrument-class rule: non-statutory instruments do not satisfy STD-07. PROTECT Act pending in legislature.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No statutory PRA; no statutory AG enforcement authority specifically over cooperation laws.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Pending bill. None enacted.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "MD": { "name": "Maryland", "total_score": 11, "grade": "C", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 1, "cite": "HB 711 (2026) Data Privacy Act (DMV/data firewall, partial basis) + SB 791/Ch. 872 (2026) §8-805(B)(2)(I) + CP §5-104(b)(2)(i) status-inquiry prohibitions", "notes": "Ch. 872 (law without signature May 31 2026, emergency = effective immediately) adds hard 'may not' status-inquiry bans binding state+local corrections (all duties) and all certified LE (during stop/search/arrest). Personnel restrictions present; resource restrictions (funds/facilities/equipment) still absent → 1 per §4.1.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 444 / Ch. 2 (2026, signed Gov Moore Feb 17) — comprehensive 287(g) ban (state agencies, local govts, county sheriffs); existing terminate by July 2026", "notes": "287(g) lynchpin met + state+local breadth.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 1222 / Ch. 718 (2025) Maryland Values Act", "notes": "Schools, libraries, healthcare, courthouses = 4 of 6 with judicial-warrant requirement.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 1, "cite": "HB 1017 / Ch. 173 (2026) + HB 1018 (2026)", "notes": "Mandatory minimum standards + zoning approval bar; not full prohibition.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 711 (2026) Data Privacy Act + Md. Transp. Code §12-303.1", "notes": "4 of 5 domains (voter, MVA, schools, public benefits/health). Hard-denial. Eff. July 1, 2026. Ch. 872 (2026) adds LE info-sharing ban (CP §5-104(b)(2)(V), court-order-only exception); offset: §8-805(C)(2) MANDATES 48-hr advance release notice to federal authorities for detainer subjects at state correctional facilities.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 1, "cite": "SB 791 / Ch. 872 (2026) — CS §8-805(B)(2)(II)3, (IV) judicial-warrant requirement for detainer holds + transfers; §8-805(A)(6) excludes DHS/DOJ documents", "notes": "Rescored 2026-06-10 from chaptered text (law May 31 2026, emergency). Judicial warrant defined to exclude administrative warrants — meets the core test. Capped at 1 per codebook §5.5: 'covered convicted individual' carveout (§8-805(A)(4)) strips warrant protection for ANY Maryland felony conviction (broad exemption, not serious-offense-tied). LE track (CP §5-104) bars civil-status detention with no felony carveout. Court-status: 17 sheriffs filed suit ~May 27 2026 — no injunction, flag only.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "HB 711 is data-sharing not documentation-architecture.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 2, "cite": "SB 791 / Ch. 872 (2026) — CP §5-104(d) PRA (actual + punitive damages + injunctive) + CS §8-805(E) AG/individual civil action (injunctive)", "notes": "Rescored 2026-06-10 from chaptered text. PRA covers the cooperation law broadly across both tracks: LE violations → actual + punitive damages + injunctive relief, individual standing; correctional violations → AG or individual civil action, injunctive relief (meets §4.8 remedy floor: damages OR injunctive). Gaps noted: no attorney-fee shifting; corrections track lacks damages remedy; AG authority is civil-action (not audit/corrective-order) and named only on the correctional track.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None enacted.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "ME": { "name": "Maine", "total_score": 7, "grade": "D", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 2, "cite": "LD 1971 (2026) — prohibits state/local LE participation; LD 2058", "notes": "Comprehensive prohibition; state+local. EFFECTIVE-DATE FLAG: LD 1971 = PL Ch. 517 (law without signature Jan 11 2026) takes effect Jul 29 2026 — scored as enacted (durability satisfied at enactment; rescindable only by legislative action). Pending codebook §5.1 clarification on enacted-vs-commenced.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "No statutory 287(g) bar: LD 1259 (287(g) ban) FAILED 2026; Wells PD voluntary 287(g) paused (non-statutory).", "notes": "Re-scored 1->0 (2026-05-21 durability audit): lynchpin not met; no durable statutory 287(g) ban. Failed bill + voluntary local action do not score under sec.1.1.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 1, "cite": "LD 2106 / PL Ch. 770 (signed Apr 23 2026) — judicial-warrant access standard, state-operated locations", "notes": "Corrected 2026-06-10 (audit): Ch. 770 MANDATES the judicial-warrant standard only at state-operated facilities — public schools/colleges, state libraries, and the two state psychiatric hospitals (Dorothea Dix, Riverview). Private hospitals, childcare, and other locations are OPT-IN, not mandated. Mandatory coverage = 1-2 of the six §4.3 location types → 1-point bar (was scored 2 on the assumption of mandated multi-type coverage). Effective ~summer 2026 (90 days post-adjournment).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No private-detention prohibition.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 1, "cite": "LD 1971 (handover protections) + voter-MOU refusal", "notes": "Voter-roll posture only at statute level. Partial. EFFECTIVE-DATE FLAG: LD 1971 = PL Ch. 517 (law without signature Jan 11 2026) takes effect Jul 29 2026 — scored as enacted (durability satisfied at enactment; rescindable only by legislative action). Pending codebook §5.1 clarification on enacted-vs-commenced.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 2, "cite": "LD 1971 / LD 2106 (warrant requirement)", "notes": "LD 1971 + LD 2106 establish judicial warrant requirement for federal civil enforcement detention/transfer. Per v3.3: warrant requirement alone = 2/2. EFFECTIVE-DATE FLAG: LD 1971 = PL Ch. 517 (law without signature Jan 11 2026) takes effect Jul 29 2026 — scored as enacted (durability satisfied at enactment; rescindable only by legislative action). Pending codebook §5.1 clarification on enacted-vs-commenced.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "LD 1971 (AG model policy)", "notes": "LD 1971 references AG model policy — model policy is non-statutory guidance, not a reporting mandate. No statutory annual public reporting requirement. Per v3.3 §4.7 required-instrument-class rule: does not satisfy.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 1, "cite": "LD 1971 (AG enforcement)", "notes": "AG enforcement; no PRA. EFFECTIVE-DATE FLAG: LD 1971 = PL Ch. 517 (law without signature Jan 11 2026) takes effect Jul 29 2026 — scored as enacted (durability satisfied at enactment; rescindable only by legislative action). Pending codebook §5.1 clarification on enacted-vs-commenced.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None enacted.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "MI": { "name": "Michigan", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "SB 508/509/510 pending.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None enacted.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None enacted.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Voter-MOU refusal is executive posture only.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None enacted.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "AG Nessel active but no documented enforcement at threshold.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "MN": { "name": "Minnesota", "total_score": 1, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "MN AG Opinion (Dec 12, 2025) addresses CONTRACT formation only (STD-02), not personnel deployment. Personnel dimension has no source.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "v3.3 durability (§4.2): no durable statutory 287(g) ban. Limitation rests on the MN AG Opinion (Dec 12 2025), interpretive guidance, not statute; HF 3924/SF 4176 not enacted. AG-opinion-only → 0; opinion retained in per-state narrative.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "SF 3699 (advanced) pending.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 1, "cite": "Driver's Licenses for All (HF 4, 2023) + DOL Nlets blocks Nov 2025 + voter-MOU refusal", "notes": "2 domains (DMV + voter).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "MO": { "name": "Missouri", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "RSMo 67.307 + EO 25-04 + EO 25-05 + HB 495", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "RSMo 67.307", "notes": "Comprehensive mandate-cooperation.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "60+ local agencies in 287(g).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "MS": { "name": "Mississippi", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "HB 538 (2026)", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 538 (2026)", "notes": "Mandates detainer compliance + AG enforcement (opposite).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "MT": { "name": "Montana", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "MCA 2-1-602", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "MCA 2-1-602", "notes": "Mandate-cooperation.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "AG-signed 287(g) MOA Feb 2025.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "NC": { "name": "North Carolina", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "HB 10 (2024) + HB 318 (Oct 2025)", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 10 (2024)", "notes": "Mandates detainer compliance.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 318 (Oct 2025)", "notes": "Magistrate citizenship inquiry (opposite).", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "ND": { "name": "North Dakota", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "NDCC 44-08-25 / HB 1303", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "NDCC 44-08-25", "notes": "Mandate cooperation; explicit anti-firewall.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "NE": { "name": "Nebraska", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "EO 25-01 (Pillen, state agencies only — no statutory local preemption)", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "EO 25-01 (Pillen)", "notes": "Mandates cooperation; LB 907/1034 failed.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "McCook ICE detention netting state $14.25M/year.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "NH": { "name": "New Hampshire", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "HB 511 + SB 62 (signed Ayotte May 22, 2025, eff. Jan 1, 2026)", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 511 + SB 62", "notes": "Mandate detainer compliance.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "13 agencies in 287(g).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "NJ": { "name": "New Jersey", "total_score": 15, "grade": "A", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": true, "court_status_modifier_notes": "STD-04: AB 5207 struck down 3d Cir. July 22, 2025 (CoreCivic v. Gov. of NJ); cert window expired ~Oct 2025 → score 0. GEO Group Delaney Hall (1,000 beds) operating.", "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 2, "cite": "A4071/S3521 (March 25, 2026) — statutory codification of AG Directive 2018-6", "notes": "State+local statutory bar, broad scope.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 2, "cite": "A4071/S3521 — explicit statutory bar on 287(g) participation", "notes": "287(g) lynchpin met statutorily (previously AG directive); state+local. Combined with detention-contract prohibitions.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 2, "cite": "A6308/P.L.2025 c.401 Safe Communities Act + AG Directive 2018-6", "notes": "Schools, hospitals, courthouses, places of worship covered.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "AB 5207 — STRUCK DOWN as applied (CoreCivic v. Gov. of NJ, 3d Cir. July 22, 2025); 90-day cert window expired", "notes": "Court-status modifier: statute unenforceable against federal contracts under intergovernmental immunity. GEO Group Delaney Hall (1,000 beds) operating.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 2, "cite": "Privacy Protection Act (2026) + Safe Communities Act + AG Trust Directive", "notes": "4 domains firewalled (voter, DMV, schools, health) with hard-denial.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 2, "cite": "A4071/S3521 (warrant component); AG Trust Directive", "notes": "A4071/S3521 (signed March 2026) codifies judicial warrant requirement; combined with AG Trust Directive layered with statutory authority. Per v3.3: warrant requirement alone = 2/2.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 2, "cite": "A4071/S3521 + AG documentation framework", "notes": "Statutory bar + AG framework with public posting.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 1, "cite": "Immigrant Trust Act (A4071/S3521, signed Mar 25 2026)", "notes": "v3.3 durability (§4.8): the Immigrant Trust Act codifies mandatory annual reporting (LE → county prosecutors → AG, public posting) but not comprehensive statutory AG enforcement authority (investigation/audit/corrective orders) reaching local LE, nor a private right of action. Statutory but limited → 1. Prior 2/2 rested on the AG Immigrant Trust Directive's enforcement practice (executive instrument).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 2, "cite": "S3114 (signed Mar 25, 2026) — prohibits LE face coverings + requires agent ID before arrest; recording via state body-camera mandates (§4.9)", "notes": "S3114 bans masks/face-coverings for law enforcement (incl. federal agents) and mandates ID before arrest (narrow exceptions: undercover, threat, medical). Recording dimension via state body-camera mandates per §4.9. Verified: NJ Gov press release 2026-03-25 + NJ Legislature S3114.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "NM": { "name": "New Mexico", "total_score": 9, "grade": "C", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 1, "cite": "HB 9 Sec. 4 (2026)", "notes": "Bans detention agreements but no broad warrant/detainer rule.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 9 Sec. 4 (2026) — explicit 287(g) ban + termination of existing", "notes": "287(g) lynchpin met.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 1, "cite": "Pre-existing protections; HB 9 doesn't add sensitive locations", "notes": "Partial; no comprehensive sensitive-locations stack.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 1, "cite": "HB 9 Sec. 3 (2026) — public-land prohibition", "notes": "Bans public land/property for immigration detention; doesn't reach private operators on private land.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 1, "cite": "SB 36 / Ch. 138 (2025) + SB 40 (2026) ALPR ban", "notes": "2-3 domains; professional licensing borderline per legal-analysis memo (does not pass 2-part test).", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 1, "cite": "HB 9 Sec. 5 + HB 9 framework", "notes": "Partial warrant + AG/DA enforcement.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "SB 36 nondisclosure framework", "notes": "SB 36 (Nondisclosure of Sensitive Personal Information Act) is data-privacy statute (STD-05 territory), not cooperation-activity reporting. Per v3.3 §4.7 PII-tracking exclusion: does not contribute to STD-07.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 9 Sec. 5 (AG/DA civil action only) + SB 36 enforcement", "notes": "HB 9 Sec. 5 + SB 36 enforcement comprehensive via AG and DA civil action authority. Reaches state and local actors. Per v3.3: AG authority comprehensive = 2/2.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None enacted.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "NV": { "name": "Nevada", "total_score": 4, "grade": "D", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 1, "cite": "AB 281 (2019) cooperation limits", "notes": "Partial.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No 287(g) ban.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 1, "cite": "AB 4 (2025 Special Session) — schools only", "notes": "1 of 6 location types; partial.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Private prison ban exempts immigration detention.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 1, "cite": "NRS 483.291 (driver authorization card) + voter-MOU refusal", "notes": "2 domains.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 1, "cite": "AB 4 (2025) — NDOC detainee locator + legislative approval", "notes": "Limited transparency mechanism.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "NY": { "name": "New York", "total_score": 14, "grade": "B", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 2, "cite": "Ch. 55, Laws of 2026, Part LL Subpart A (Local Cops, Local Crimes Act) - statewide statutory ban on using state/local personnel and resources for federal civil immigration enforcement.", "notes": "Re-scored 1->2 (2026-05-29): FY27 budget enacted a durable statutory personnel/resource withdrawal, superseding the prior non-durable EO 170.1 + AG-guidance basis.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 2, "cite": "Ch. 55, Laws of 2026, Part LL Subpart A - statutory ban on formal AND informal 287(g) agreements + IGSA/detention contracts.", "notes": "Re-scored 0->2 (2026-05-29): codifying 287(g) ban now enacted as durable statute (previously EO/AG-guidance only).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 2, "cite": "Ch. 55, Laws of 2026, Part LL Subpart E (Sensitive Location Protection Act) - 16+ protected location types.", "notes": "Re-scored 1->2 (2026-05-29): statutory sensitive-location protection enacted well beyond courthouses (was POCA courthouses-only).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 1, "cite": "Ch. 55, Laws of 2026, Part LL Subpart A - bars local-government spending/contracting on private immigration detention (partial).", "notes": "Re-scored 0->1 (2026-05-29): statutory local-gov spending restriction on private detention. Caps at 1 - the operator ban (Dignity Not Detention Act) was NOT enacted.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 1, "cite": "Green Light Law (VTL §201(12), 2019) — DMV/driver-records hard-denial firewall", "notes": "Corrected 2026-06-10 (audit): one statutory data domain, not multi-domain. VTL §201(12) 'shall not... disclose' covers DMV records only. No statute found firewalling voter rolls (Elec. L. §5-614 has no immigration restriction), school, health, or licensing data — those rest on AG guidance (non-scoring per durability). FY27 budget firewall covers non-LE employees only (police carved out in negotiation) and benefits data is outside the five enumerated domains. 1-2 domains w/ hard denial = 1 per codebook §4.5.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 2, "cite": "Ch. 55, Laws of 2026, Part LL Subpart E - judicial-warrant requirement for access to nonpublic areas of protected locations.", "notes": "Re-scored 1->2 (2026-05-29): judicial-warrant requirement codified statewide (was AG-discretionary + POCA courthouse only).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "AG James guidance", "notes": "Holds 0 (2026-05-29): the statutory annual-public-reporting mandate lived in the (unenacted) NY for All Act. The enacted Office of Immigrant Trust is an enforcement function (STD-08), not transparency reporting.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 2, "cite": "Exec. Law §63-e (Office of Immigrant Trust, Ch. 55 L.2026 Part LL Subpart G) + Part LL Subpart B state civil cause of action", "notes": "Re-cited 2026-06-10 from enrolled S9005C text (prior cite was AG litigation conduct, which does not score per v3.1 decision #6). §63-e grants: complaint intake + investigation of state AND local entities/officers/contractors (subpoenas, witnesses under oath, examine/copy/remove any employer or agency records, inspect all local correctional facilities) + civil actions for injunctive/declaratory relief, assurances of discontinuance, and office-imposed monitoring periods. Comprehensive statutory AG authority reaching local LE = 2/2 per §4.8 (functional-protection parity with CA). Caveat flagged: investigations of STATE agencies require a governor referral (§63-e(4)) — local track is direct.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 2, "cite": "Ch. 55, Laws of 2026, Part LL Subpart F (MELT Act) - visible officer ID (name/badge/agency) + law-enforcement mask/disguise prohibition; recording prong satisfied via NY Exec. Law §234 (State Police body-worn camera mandate) AND NY Civil Rights Law §79-p (Right to Monitor Act - citizen-recording authorization with private right of action). Civil enforcement: FY27 Bivens private right of action (Part LL Subpart B).", "notes": "Re-scored 1->2 (2026-06-06): recording prong satisfied per codebook §4.9 (body camera OR citizen-recording authorization - any one form suffices). The 2026-05-29 cap-at-1 overlooked NY's pre-existing recording statutes - Exec. Law §234 (State Police BWC mandate) and Civil Rights Law §79-p (Right to Monitor Act, with PRA). All three substantive dimensions (visible ID + mask + recording) + civil enforcement now present. Consistent with OR/NJ/CT/CA, whose recording prong likewise rests on body-cam/citizen-recording statutes (NY's basis is stronger than OR's). External-framing guard: do not claim these laws require federal agents to record. Pin-cite verified 2026-06-10 against enrolled S9005C: MELT = Ch. 55 L.2026 Part LL Subpart F (Civil Rights Law amendment — mask/disguise prohibition + visible-display definition; violation, then misdemeanor for repeat).", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "OH": { "name": "Ohio", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "HB 826 (April 2026) would create felony for obstruction (opposite); HB 26 + SB 172 + HB 200 push mandate-cooperation.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None enacted.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "OK": { "name": "Oklahoma", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 4156 / Title 21 §1795 (2024)", "notes": "Mandate-cooperation.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "25 agencies in 287(g).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "$175M annual revenue projection from federal detention.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "OR": { "name": "Oregon", "total_score": 17, "grade": "A", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "court_status_watch_list": "OR HB 4138 (STD-09) — Oregon Capital Chronicle (May 8, 2026) flagged risk of 9th Cir. SB 805 ruling logic; no challenge filed", "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 2, "cite": "ORS 181A.820 (1987) + Sanctuary Promise Act (HB 3265, 2021)", "notes": "Explicit money/equipment/personnel prohibition covering state AND political subdivisions. Reference standard.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 2, "cite": "ORS 181A.829(1) — explicit 287(g) agreement ban + ORS 181A.829(3) private-detention ban", "notes": "287(g) lynchpin met + private detention ban.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 3265 (2021) sensitive locations + HB 4079 (2026) schools + SB 1570 (2026) hospitals + HB 4114 (2026) Protect Your Door Act", "notes": "Schools, hospitals, courthouses, etc. = 4+ locations covered.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 2, "cite": "ORS 181A.829(3) — private immigration detention facility prohibition (statewide)", "notes": "Foundational since 2021; comprehensive.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 2, "cite": "Sanctuary Promise Act + SB 1587 (2026) data brokers + SB 277 (2025) custody data + voter-MOU refusal", "notes": "4 of 5 domains firewalled.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 3265 (2021) civil cause of action + HB 4114 (2026) civil cause for warrantless entry", "notes": "HB 3265 (2021) + HB 4114 (2026) establish civil cause of action for warrantless entry; judicial warrant requirement for federal civil enforcement. Per v3.3: warrant requirement alone = 2/2.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 1, "cite": "HB 3265 transparency/cause of action + Sanctuary Promise hotline", "notes": "Partial public reporting.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 3265 (PRA via civil action for injunctive relief) + statutory AG authority + HB 4114 (2026) Protect Your Door Act PRA", "notes": "Both mechanisms: PRA + statutory AG enforcement authority. Reference standard.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 2, "cite": "HB 4138 (signed Apr 9, 2026) — visible name/number/badge/agency + mask limits + civil rights enforcement", "notes": "Cleanest enacted template per federal-agent ID memo: visible ID + mask limits + civil enforcement mechanism + framed for all law enforcement. Recording dimension satisfied via state body camera mandates per spec §2 plain reading. No injunction as of audit date.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "PA": { "name": "Pennsylvania", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "78 PA agencies in 287(g) as of April 2026; SB 471 expanding mandate cooperation; multiple protective bills (SB 1139, SB 1193) in committee.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None enacted.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "PA refused DOJ voter MOU but executive posture only.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "RI": { "name": "Rhode Island", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Morales v. Chadbourne (2014) is federal court ruling on federal law per codebook §1.2 — does not count as binding state law. RI has operational practice but lacks statutory architecture.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None enacted.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Protected Spaces Act (H5225/S0537) PENDING. Providence EO is city-level only.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "RI refused DOJ voter MOU (executive posture only); below partial threshold per codebook.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "SC": { "name": "South Carolina", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "Act 280 (2008) — cooperation framework; no explicit detainer-hold mandate", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "Act 280 (2008)", "notes": "37 SC agencies in 287(g); HB 4764 would mandate statewide.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "37 SC agencies in 287(g).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "§6-1-170 reverses PRA.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "SD": { "name": "South Dakota", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "SB 7 (2025, signed Rhoden Feb 7, eff. Jul 1)", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "SB 7 (2025)", "notes": "Prohibits sanctuary policies; SDHP-ICE MOA active.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "TN": { "name": "Tennessee", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "Public Chapter 1040 (2018) Anti-Sanctuary Act + HB 6001 (2025) + HB2219/SB2223 (2026, ~Pub. Ch. 1015 - statewide 287(g) sheriff mandate, effective Jan 1 2027)", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "Public Chapter 1040 (2018)", "notes": "Strongest mandate-cooperation package in any state.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 2219", "notes": "Mandates 287(g) for ALL sheriffs by 2027.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 6001", "notes": "Class E felony for sanctuary policy adoption (CIED).", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "TX": { "name": "Texas", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "SB 4 (85th Leg., 2017) + SB 8 (89th Leg., 2025)", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "SB 4 (2017)", "notes": "Mandates cooperation; preempts local non-cooperation.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "SB 8 (2025)", "notes": "Mandates 287(g) in counties 100K+ (~234/254 counties). $25,500/day fines for non-compliance.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Operation Lone Star $11B+ in state revenue.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "UT": { "name": "Utah", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 497 (2011)", "notes": "Mandates status checks.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "SB 136 (2026) sensitive locations FAILED.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 226 (2025)", "notes": "Mandates ICE notification post-sentence.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "VA": { "name": "Virginia", "total_score": 5, "grade": "D", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 1, "cite": "SB 783 (signed 2026-04-22, eff. 2026-07-01) - statutory limits on state/local cooperation with federal civil immigration enforcement (partial). EO 12 supplementary (non-durable).", "notes": "Partial personnel/resource limit via SB 783 (durable statute, Gov. Spanberger 2026-04-22). EO 12 (2026-02-04) supplementary only. HB 1441 enacted status unconfirmed as of 2026-05-21.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 1, "cite": "SB 783 (signed 2026-04-22) - conditions on federal immigration agreements + judicial-warrant requirement (partial 287(g) restriction). EO 12 supplementary.", "notes": "Partial 287(g)/cooperation restriction via SB 783 (durable statute); not an outright statutory 287(g) ban -> 1. EO 12 (non-durable) supplementary.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 1, "cite": "SB 783/HB 1441 — judicial warrants for cooperation under formal agreements", "notes": "Partial; not full sensitive-locations stack.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No private-detention prohibition.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 1, "cite": "SB 783/HB 1441 (2026) court accountability framework", "notes": "Partial.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 1, "cite": "SB 783/HB 1441 — AG enforcement framework", "notes": "Spanberger sought to strip AG-suit authority but legislature rejected. AG framework; no PRA.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "VT": { "name": "Vermont", "total_score": 5, "grade": "D", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 1, "cite": "20 V.S.A. § 2366 (FIP) + Act 75 (2023)", "notes": "FIP model policy; no penalty for honoring detainers — score 1.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 1, "cite": "S.44 / Act 28 (2025) + 20 V.S.A. § 4652 — only Governor (with AG) can authorize 287(g)", "notes": "Per codebook §2.3, gubernatorial-only authorization is administrative restriction; no formal 287(g) ban for local sheriffs.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 1, "cite": "20 V.S.A. § 2366 (FIP sensitive-location considerations)", "notes": "Designations without penalty; partial.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 1, "cite": "23 V.S.A. §603 (Driver Privilege Card) + voter-MOU refusal", "notes": "2 domains.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 1, "cite": "H.849 Constitutional Accountability Act (Apr 27, 2026) — PRA for federal-rights violations", "notes": "General federal-rights PRA; covers civil enforcement but not state-statute-only violations.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "H.849 (PRA via constitutional accountability)", "notes": "H.849 Constitutional Accountability Act provides PRA for federal-rights violations broadly — but per spec §4.2 strict reading and v3.3 codebook §4.8 exclusion: Converse-1983-style general civil rights remedies do not contribute to STD-08 (which requires cooperation-specific enforcement mechanisms). No statutory AG authority specific to cooperation laws.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "WA": { "name": "Washington", "total_score": 12, "grade": "B", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 2, "cite": "Keep Washington Working Act / E2SB 5497 (2019) Ch. 440 / RCW 10.93.160 + RCW 43.17.425 + SB 5002 (2025)", "notes": "Comprehensive state+local resource prohibition. Reference standard.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 2, "cite": "KWW Act prohibits 287(g) agreements + IGSA prohibitions", "notes": "287(g) lynchpin met + multiple contract categories.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 1, "cite": "KWW Act sensitive location protections", "notes": "Partial — no civil-penalty enforcement triggers per STRICT-R2.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 1, "cite": "E2SHB 1232 / Ch. 235 (2025) — DOH unannounced inspection authority for private immigration detention; AG actively litigating GEO Group as of May 1, 2026", "notes": "Inspection authority (not prohibition); litigation live.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 1, "cite": "RCW 46.20.155 (DMV/driver-records hard-denial firewall)", "notes": "v3.3 durability (§4.5): of 5 data domains, only DMV/driver records (RCW 46.20.155) is a clean statutory hard-denial firewall. Voter (AG voter-MOU refusal), schools/health (RCW 43.10.310 adopt-AG-model-policy route), and professional licensing (RCW 18.415 eligibility, not a data firewall) rest on executive instruments or lack domain-specific hard-denial → below the 3-of-5 statutory bar → 1. KWW Act general state-agency prohibition retained in narrative.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 1, "cite": "KWW Act AG enforcement authority + judicial warrant framework", "notes": "Partial; rights notifications less developed.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 1, "cite": "KWW Act documentation + AG oversight", "notes": "Partial.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 2, "cite": "KWW Act statutory AG authority (Adams County investigation Jan 2022; multiple ongoing cases)", "notes": "Keep Washington Working Act statutory AG authority comprehensive: Adams County investigation Jan 2022; multiple ongoing cases against non-compliant locals. Per v3.3: AG authority comprehensive = 2/2.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 1, "cite": "SB 5855 (signed Mar 19, 2026) — opaque face coverings prohibition; HB 2165 (false LE ID prohibition)", "notes": "Mask prohibition + recording (state body cam mandates) covered, but visible-ID dimension is structural gap — HB 2165 prohibits FALSE ID, not VISIBLE ID requirement. 2 of 3 dimensions = 1/2 per codebook §4.9.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "WI": { "name": "Wisconsin", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Evers veto of AB 24 (Apr 3, 2026) prevented mandate; protective bills (AB 739/SB 493, SB 484/AB 444) all died in committee.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None enacted.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "AG Kaul amicus brief participation does not score.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "WV": { "name": "West Virginia", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "WV Code §15-16-2", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "WV Code §15-16-2", "notes": "Mandates cooperation. Morrisey 287(g) Aug 2025.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Morrisey 287(g) Aug 2025.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Notable: Goodwin federal court ruling Feb 2026 (Urquilla-Ramos) — federal ruling, doesn't score under codebook §1.2 but informs framing.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "WY": { "name": "Wyoming", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": true, "mandate_cite": "HB 133 (Feb 2025)", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "HB 133 (Feb 2025)", "notes": "Mandates cooperation.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "WHP signed 287(g) July 2025; 7 counties + 4 towns enrolled.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "high" } ] }, "PR": { "name": "Puerto Rico", "total_score": 0, "grade": "F", "mandate_cooperation": false, "mandate_cite": "", "court_status_modifier_applied": false, "standards": [ { "id": "STD-01", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "No territorial statute limiting cooperation. Governor González (PNP) actively directs cooperation.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-02", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-03", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-04", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-05", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "DTOP shared 6,000 license-holder records with HSI.", "confidence": "high" }, { "id": "STD-06", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "Police General Order 600-626 is executive, not statute.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-07", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-08", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "medium" }, { "id": "STD-09", "score": 0, "cite": "", "notes": "None.", "confidence": "medium" } ] } } }